The trouble is that IMHO, the weird rumors about Republicans generally turn out to be true, while the weird rumors about Democrats generally don't. Not because our politicians are inherently better behaved -- I think John Edwards proves us out on that, but because Republicans have a highly developed smear machine while most Democrats generally eschew rumormongering as 'below them'.
I actually don't think this is true, based mostly on the fact that it makes more sense for a 44 year old to be giving birth to a child with Downs' than a 16 year old.
But on the other hand, I'd neither be terribly surprised if someone eventually digs up hard evidence. Seems like something the Enquirer is probably all over... about ten hours ago.
I actually don't believe in Liberal Media Bias in the slightest. Most papers in America are right of center because the owners of the major media congloms know which side butters their bread.
Or in short: until any paper I read in the US is as liberal as the Guardian, I have to respectfully disagree. (But MSNBC is doing its level best to cancel out Fox.)
no subject
I actually don't think this is true, based mostly on the fact that it makes more sense for a 44 year old to be giving birth to a child with Downs' than a 16 year old.
But on the other hand, I'd neither be terribly surprised if someone eventually digs up hard evidence. Seems like something the Enquirer is probably all over... about ten hours ago.
no subject
You're right on this count.
no subject
Or in short: until any paper I read in the US is as liberal as the Guardian, I have to respectfully disagree. (But MSNBC is doing its level best to cancel out Fox.)